Best Known (34, 192, s)-Nets in Base 2
(34, 192, 24)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (34, 192, 24)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 192, 24)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 23)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 23)-sequence over F2, using
(34, 192, 28)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (34, 192, 28)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 192, 28)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 27)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 27)-sequence over F2, using
(34, 192, 43)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (34, 192, 44)-net in base 2, because
- 23 times m-reduction [i] would yield (34, 169, 44)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2169, 44, S2, 4, 135), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 14965 776766 268445 882405 732687 014738 121276 749240 074240 / 17 > 2169 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2169, 44, S2, 4, 135), but