Best Known (158, 195, s)-Nets in Base 2
(158, 195, 269)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (158, 195, 269)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 23, 9)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 8)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 8)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (135, 172, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 43, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 43, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (5, 23, 9)-net over F2, using
(158, 195, 604)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (158, 195, 604)-net over F2, using
(158, 195, 13234)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (158, 195, 13235)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (158, 194, 13235)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 25136 944682 866760 567004 619976 821427 298929 266385 683552 937275 > 2194 [i]