Best Known (155, 199, s)-Nets in Base 2
(155, 199, 202)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (155, 199, 202)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 25, 7)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 6)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 7, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 6)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (130, 174, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 58, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 58, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (3, 25, 7)-net over F2, using
(155, 199, 386)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (155, 199, 386)-net over F2, using
(155, 199, 4751)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (155, 199, 4752)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 804335 556973 218366 748159 016351 136032 173581 893248 292288 387848 > 2199 [i]