Best Known (146, 214, s)-Nets in Base 2
(146, 214, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (146, 214, 112)-net over F2, using
- 12 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (146, 226, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 113, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 113, 56)-net over F4, using
(146, 214, 165)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (146, 214, 165)-net over F2, using
(146, 214, 1012)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (146, 214, 1013)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 26548 034333 797222 987755 117799 453398 952604 293633 719666 902830 770762 > 2214 [i]