Best Known (174, 214, s)-Nets in Base 2
(174, 214, 272)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (174, 214, 272)-net over F2, using
- 21 times duplication [i] based on digital (173, 213, 272)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (9, 29, 12)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 11)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 12, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 11)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (144, 184, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 46, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 46, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (9, 29, 12)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(174, 214, 683)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (174, 214, 683)-net over F2, using
(174, 214, 13784)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (174, 214, 13785)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 26336 664328 714021 507822 179249 530360 902771 026922 689495 351198 620618 > 2214 [i]