Best Known (135, 218, s)-Nets in Base 2
(135, 218, 75)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (135, 218, 75)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (135, 219, 75)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 81, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 138, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 81, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(135, 218, 111)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (135, 218, 111)-net over F2, using
(135, 218, 574)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (135, 218, 575)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (135, 217, 575)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 221645 187092 940038 790627 856373 129415 687592 798303 323105 132371 129864 > 2217 [i]