Best Known (143, 218, s)-Nets in Base 2
(143, 218, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (143, 218, 112)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (143, 220, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 110, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 110, 56)-net over F4, using
(143, 218, 140)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (143, 218, 140)-net over F2, using
(143, 218, 800)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (143, 218, 801)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (143, 217, 801)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 215463 909990 084691 718766 355516 203932 561919 036954 113759 245526 323104 > 2217 [i]