Best Known (170, 219, s)-Nets in Base 2
(170, 219, 205)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (170, 219, 205)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 30, 10)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 9)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 10, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 9)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (140, 189, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 63, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 63, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (6, 30, 10)-net over F2, using
(170, 219, 405)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (170, 219, 405)-net over F2, using
(170, 219, 5282)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (170, 219, 5283)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (170, 218, 5283)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 422690 857433 565633 689602 585721 110391 738122 610304 828059 117603 555612 > 2218 [i]