Best Known (173, 223, s)-Nets in Base 2
(173, 223, 205)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (173, 223, 205)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 31, 10)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 9)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 10, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 9)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (142, 192, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 64, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 64, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (6, 31, 10)-net over F2, using
(173, 223, 409)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (173, 223, 409)-net over F2, using
(173, 223, 4892)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (173, 223, 4893)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 13 497361 819750 657475 953513 166610 670334 403605 367504 415939 818529 620722 > 2223 [i]