Best Known (137, 224, s)-Nets in Base 2
(137, 224, 75)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (137, 224, 75)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (137, 225, 75)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 83, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 142, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 83, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(137, 224, 109)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (137, 224, 109)-net over F2, using
(137, 224, 553)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (137, 224, 554)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (137, 223, 554)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 13 931642 014949 602848 723048 742361 045988 231507 138406 201655 653172 447556 > 2223 [i]