Best Known (182, 224, s)-Nets in Base 2
(182, 224, 274)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (182, 224, 274)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 32, 14)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 13)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 14, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 13)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (150, 192, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 48, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 48, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (11, 32, 14)-net over F2, using
(182, 224, 701)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (182, 224, 701)-net over F2, using
(182, 224, 14077)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (182, 224, 14078)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 26 980931 202767 311293 387919 951383 305880 645729 058926 278195 580990 601369 > 2224 [i]