Best Known (174, 226, s)-Nets in Base 2
(174, 226, 201)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (174, 226, 201)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 28, 6)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 5)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 6, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 5)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (146, 198, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 66, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 66, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (2, 28, 6)-net over F2, using
(174, 226, 386)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (174, 226, 386)-net over F2, using
(174, 226, 4326)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (174, 226, 4327)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 108 359019 608851 666808 035019 247658 489997 086079 623655 032080 582626 253940 > 2226 [i]