Best Known (180, 226, s)-Nets in Base 2
(180, 226, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (180, 226, 260)-net over F2, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (180, 232, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 58, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 58, 65)-net over F16, using
(180, 226, 545)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (180, 226, 545)-net over F2, using
(180, 226, 8524)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (180, 226, 8525)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 107 935262 344434 011573 901499 521942 557481 740625 843038 855177 321071 000096 > 2226 [i]