Best Known (150, 229, s)-Nets in Base 2
(150, 229, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (150, 229, 112)-net over F2, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (150, 234, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 117, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 117, 56)-net over F4, using
(150, 229, 145)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (150, 229, 145)-net over F2, using
(150, 229, 829)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (150, 229, 830)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (150, 228, 830)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 443 081121 794913 024448 963506 420361 030206 955735 642382 576670 429408 597160 > 2228 [i]