Best Known (166, 229, s)-Nets in Base 2
(166, 229, 144)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (166, 229, 144)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (165, 229, 144)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (165, 231, 144)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (11, 77, 48)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 47)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 47)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (11, 77, 48)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (165, 231, 144)-net over F2, using
(166, 229, 246)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (166, 229, 246)-net over F2, using
(166, 229, 1987)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (166, 229, 1988)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (166, 228, 1988)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 437 262446 762726 136987 354502 058894 290409 435295 537251 413221 132358 743216 > 2228 [i]