Best Known (92, 229, s)-Nets in Base 2
(92, 229, 53)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (92, 229, 53)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (90, 229, 53)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (90, 52)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, 1 place with degree 2, and 4 places with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (90, 52)-sequence over F2, using
(92, 229, 60)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (92, 229, 60)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (92, 59)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 92 and N(F) ≥ 60, using
(92, 229, 180)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (92, 229, 181)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (92, 228, 181)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 501 018805 500418 624953 288838 561603 887307 312799 983772 100098 559716 117090 > 2228 [i]