Best Known (152, 231, s)-Nets in Base 2
(152, 231, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (152, 231, 112)-net over F2, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (152, 238, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 119, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 119, 56)-net over F4, using
(152, 231, 149)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (152, 231, 149)-net over F2, using
(152, 231, 861)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (152, 231, 862)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (152, 230, 862)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1771 169986 175855 633123 401096 980806 633321 518092 411213 357258 121564 954704 > 2230 [i]