Best Known (182, 231, s)-Nets in Base 2
(182, 231, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (182, 231, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (180, 231, 260)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (180, 232, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 58, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 58, 65)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (180, 232, 260)-net over F2, using
(182, 231, 491)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (182, 231, 491)-net over F2, using
(182, 231, 7484)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (182, 231, 7485)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (182, 230, 7485)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1726 273704 774008 887035 417531 690181 101736 999533 338631 628515 192184 516313 > 2230 [i]