Best Known (187, 232, s)-Nets in Base 2
(187, 232, 270)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (187, 232, 270)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 28, 10)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 9)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 10, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 9)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (159, 204, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 51, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 51, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (6, 28, 10)-net over F2, using
(187, 232, 646)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (187, 232, 646)-net over F2, using
(187, 232, 13079)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (187, 232, 13080)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (187, 231, 13080)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3453 724421 609792 890075 292096 334896 638746 271296 890317 168798 754167 423111 > 2231 [i]