Best Known (137, 234, s)-Nets in Base 2
(137, 234, 69)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (137, 234, 69)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (19, 67, 20)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 19)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 20, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 19)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (70, 167, 49)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (70, 48)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (70, 48)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (19, 67, 20)-net over F2, using
(137, 234, 97)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (137, 234, 97)-net over F2, using
(137, 234, 474)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (137, 234, 475)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (137, 233, 475)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 14333 255190 175960 845072 725572 523877 270084 593310 024523 699638 121617 166250 > 2233 [i]