Best Known (142, 234, s)-Nets in Base 2
(142, 234, 75)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (142, 234, 75)-net over F2, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (142, 240, 75)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 88, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 152, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 88, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(142, 234, 110)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (142, 234, 110)-net over F2, using
(142, 234, 546)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (142, 234, 547)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 28595 546359 650311 041323 249659 943343 114568 584117 560844 312659 779513 746304 > 2234 [i]