Best Known (132, 235, s)-Nets in Base 2
(132, 235, 66)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (132, 235, 66)-net over F2, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (132, 240, 66)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 93, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 147, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2 (see above)
- digital (39, 93, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(132, 235, 86)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (132, 235, 86)-net over F2, using
(132, 235, 406)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (132, 235, 407)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (132, 234, 407)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 28574 167643 528083 340189 310908 149022 368009 164510 873638 485774 287379 460744 > 2234 [i]