Best Known (182, 237, s)-Nets in Base 2
(182, 237, 202)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (182, 237, 202)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 30, 7)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 6)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 7, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 6)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (152, 207, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 69, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 69, 65)-net over F8, using
- digital (3, 30, 7)-net over F2, using
(182, 237, 394)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (182, 237, 394)-net over F2, using
(182, 237, 4633)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (182, 237, 4634)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (182, 236, 4634)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 110718 763426 679803 504197 531658 465272 279371 548829 657203 931723 683861 254308 > 2236 [i]