Best Known (143, 239, s)-Nets in Base 2
(143, 239, 75)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (143, 239, 75)-net over F2, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (143, 243, 75)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 89, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 154, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 89, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(143, 239, 106)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (143, 239, 106)-net over F2, using
(143, 239, 523)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (143, 239, 524)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 933532 155278 533923 989192 893874 499441 340166 164319 170596 266109 081331 411296 > 2239 [i]