Best Known (193, 240, s)-Nets in Base 2
(193, 240, 269)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (193, 240, 269)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 28, 9)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 8)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 8)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (165, 212, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 53, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 53, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (5, 28, 9)-net over F2, using
(193, 240, 644)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (193, 240, 644)-net over F2, using
(193, 240, 12629)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (193, 240, 12630)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (193, 239, 12630)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 884307 850829 703235 518814 448158 958144 762576 513604 447652 693202 793008 418236 > 2239 [i]