Best Known (161, 242, s)-Nets in Base 2
(161, 242, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (161, 242, 112)-net over F2, using
- 14 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (161, 256, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 128, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 128, 56)-net over F4, using
(161, 242, 163)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (161, 242, 163)-net over F2, using
(161, 242, 968)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (161, 242, 969)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (161, 241, 969)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 553458 852944 048766 242205 419996 367831 534366 837825 028694 631688 672216 677090 > 2241 [i]