Best Known (146, 243, s)-Nets in Base 2
(146, 243, 76)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (146, 243, 76)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 87, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (59, 156, 43)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54, N(F) = 42, and 1 place with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 87, 33)-net over F2, using
(146, 243, 110)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (146, 243, 110)-net over F2, using
(146, 243, 549)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (146, 243, 550)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (146, 242, 550)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7 437352 128216 476594 472224 427064 711641 319398 879091 803452 132409 140019 714208 > 2242 [i]