Best Known (194, 245, s)-Nets in Base 2
(194, 245, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (194, 245, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (192, 245, 260)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (192, 248, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 62, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 62, 65)-net over F16, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (192, 248, 260)-net over F2, using
(194, 245, 545)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (194, 245, 545)-net over F2, using
(194, 245, 8787)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (194, 245, 8788)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (194, 244, 8788)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 28 322730 365620 124238 247019 542319 322525 179643 170069 852402 700275 942988 752168 > 2244 [i]