Best Known (200, 249, s)-Nets in Base 2
(200, 249, 269)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (200, 249, 269)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 29, 9)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 8)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 8)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (171, 220, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 55, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 55, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (5, 29, 9)-net over F2, using
(200, 249, 654)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (200, 249, 654)-net over F2, using
(200, 249, 12612)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (200, 249, 12613)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (200, 248, 12613)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 453 099382 385327 200546 808965 772029 391477 565769 176048 143263 488843 004704 316376 > 2248 [i]