Best Known (201, 249, s)-Nets in Base 2
(201, 249, 272)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (201, 249, 272)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (9, 33, 12)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 11)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 12, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 11)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (168, 216, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 54, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 54, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (9, 33, 12)-net over F2, using
(201, 249, 698)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (201, 249, 698)-net over F2, using
(201, 249, 12982)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (201, 249, 12983)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 905 152392 566336 359626 038885 612719 305939 871594 405517 100064 765864 757535 013652 > 2249 [i]