Best Known (197, 251, s)-Nets in Base 2
(197, 251, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (197, 251, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (195, 251, 260)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (195, 252, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 63, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 63, 65)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (195, 252, 260)-net over F2, using
(197, 251, 507)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (197, 251, 507)-net over F2, using
(197, 251, 6828)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (197, 251, 6829)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3622 102857 782571 195617 762752 966620 244072 341949 441280 057212 315593 782932 685120 > 2251 [i]