Best Known (143, 252, s)-Nets in Base 2
(143, 252, 69)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (143, 252, 69)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (19, 73, 20)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 19)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 20, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 19)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (70, 179, 49)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (70, 48)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (70, 48)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (19, 73, 20)-net over F2, using
(143, 252, 94)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (143, 252, 94)-net over F2, using
(143, 252, 450)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (143, 252, 451)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (143, 251, 451)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3829 469162 571335 054475 595476 134254 567590 026810 813662 983630 587837 604060 082064 > 2251 [i]