Best Known (198, 252, s)-Nets in Base 2
(198, 252, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (198, 252, 260)-net over F2, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (198, 256, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 64, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 64, 65)-net over F16, using
(198, 252, 514)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (198, 252, 514)-net over F2, using
(198, 252, 7007)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (198, 252, 7008)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7254 777434 053440 938615 020523 639337 340360 466803 776428 667100 253449 708363 178451 > 2252 [i]