Best Known (200, 252, s)-Nets in Base 2
(200, 252, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (200, 252, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (198, 252, 260)-net over F2, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (198, 256, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 64, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 64, 65)-net over F16, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (198, 256, 260)-net over F2, using
(200, 252, 573)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (200, 252, 573)-net over F2, using
(200, 252, 8690)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (200, 252, 8691)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7244 432254 245292 178808 761516 265275 945628 647259 102968 049750 948148 186235 015828 > 2252 [i]