Best Known (162, 254, s)-Nets in Base 2
(162, 254, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (162, 254, 112)-net over F2, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (162, 258, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 129, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 129, 56)-net over F4, using
(162, 254, 142)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (162, 254, 142)-net over F2, using
(162, 254, 760)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (162, 254, 761)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 29174 585727 529236 625395 321295 109837 465954 534318 110386 825901 372545 665117 913336 > 2254 [i]