Best Known (202, 254, s)-Nets in Base 2
(202, 254, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (202, 254, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (201, 254, 260)-net over F2, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (201, 260, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 65, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 65, 65)-net over F16, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (201, 260, 260)-net over F2, using
(202, 254, 590)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (202, 254, 590)-net over F2, using
(202, 254, 9168)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (202, 254, 9169)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 28971 820950 019783 093149 050045 747636 630946 786527 958041 825142 693803 541933 978560 > 2254 [i]