Best Known (203, 255, s)-Nets in Base 2
(203, 255, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (203, 255, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (201, 255, 260)-net over F2, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (201, 260, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 65, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 65, 65)-net over F16, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (201, 260, 260)-net over F2, using
(203, 255, 599)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (203, 255, 599)-net over F2, using
(203, 255, 9417)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (203, 255, 9418)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 57981 127014 091303 859861 024281 947461 790683 384873 557408 853791 418061 306697 338752 > 2255 [i]