Best Known (179, 256, s)-Nets in Base 2
(179, 256, 132)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (179, 256, 132)-net over F2, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (179, 260, 132)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (49, 130, 66)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- T6 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (49, 130, 66)-net over F4, using
(179, 256, 219)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (179, 256, 219)-net over F2, using
(179, 256, 1517)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (179, 256, 1518)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (179, 255, 1518)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 57988 115060 198432 975327 734522 360936 838850 907720 528947 306572 352151 196139 623684 > 2255 [i]