Best Known (207, 256, s)-Nets in Base 2
(207, 256, 274)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (207, 256, 274)-net over F2, using
- 21 times duplication [i] based on digital (206, 255, 274)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 35, 14)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 13)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 14, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 13)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (171, 220, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 55, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 55, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (11, 35, 14)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(207, 256, 731)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (207, 256, 731)-net over F2, using
(207, 256, 15445)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (207, 256, 15446)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (207, 255, 15446)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 57913 819345 297495 429869 618794 110867 403990 544103 414390 516256 172305 492183 832376 > 2255 [i]