Best Known (205, 258, s)-Nets in Base 2
(205, 258, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (205, 258, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (201, 258, 260)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (201, 260, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 65, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 65, 65)-net over F16, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (201, 260, 260)-net over F2, using
(205, 258, 592)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (205, 258, 592)-net over F2, using
(205, 258, 9935)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (205, 258, 9936)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (205, 257, 9936)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 231992 362194 486413 487584 618775 441399 923627 377238 139048 509520 833688 463696 285108 > 2257 [i]