Best Known (202, 259, s)-Nets in Base 2
(202, 259, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (202, 259, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (201, 259, 260)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (201, 260, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 65, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 65, 65)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (201, 260, 260)-net over F2, using
(202, 259, 489)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (202, 259, 489)-net over F2, using
(202, 259, 6669)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (202, 259, 6670)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (202, 258, 6670)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 464083 048771 114632 791277 154204 075008 549988 897890 895640 312732 974534 912455 101088 > 2258 [i]