Best Known (206, 259, s)-Nets in Base 2
(206, 259, 260)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (206, 259, 260)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (201, 259, 260)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (201, 260, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 65, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 65, 65)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (201, 260, 260)-net over F2, using
(206, 259, 601)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (206, 259, 601)-net over F2, using
(206, 259, 10204)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (206, 259, 10205)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (206, 258, 10205)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 463410 454771 944452 586879 632610 543494 747227 308027 489305 886638 413046 979136 759790 > 2258 [i]