Best Known (162, 260, s)-Nets in Base 2
(162, 260, 85)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (162, 260, 85)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (54, 103, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (59, 157, 43)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54, N(F) = 42, and 1 place with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 103, 42)-net over F2, using
(162, 260, 86)-Net in Base 2 — Constructive
(162, 260, 86)-net in base 2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (160, 260, 86)-net in base 2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (30, 130, 43)-net in base 4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (30, 42)-sequence in base 4, using
- base expansion [i] based on digital (60, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54, N(F) = 42, and 1 place with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- base expansion [i] based on digital (60, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (30, 42)-sequence in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (30, 130, 43)-net in base 4, using
(162, 260, 132)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (162, 260, 132)-net over F2, using
(162, 260, 686)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (162, 260, 687)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 948963 382460 298296 272366 149140 705060 679706 633809 386556 519137 731878 072803 930048 > 2260 [i]