Best Known (24, 35, s)-Nets in Base 2
(24, 35, 50)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (24, 35, 50)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 11, 26)-net over F2, using
- digital (13, 24, 25)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (13, 25, 25)-net over F2, using
(24, 35, 51)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (24, 35, 51)-net over F2, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(235, 51, F2, 2, 11) (dual of [(51, 2), 67, 12]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(235, 102, F2, 11) (dual of [102, 67, 12]-code), using
- adding a parity check bit [i] based on linear OA(234, 101, F2, 10) (dual of [101, 67, 11]-code), using
- a “Gra†code from Grassl’s database [i]
- adding a parity check bit [i] based on linear OA(234, 101, F2, 10) (dual of [101, 67, 11]-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(235, 102, F2, 11) (dual of [102, 67, 12]-code), using
(24, 35, 283)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (24, 35, 284)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (24, 34, 284)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 17368 016238 > 234 [i]