Best Known (36, 68, s)-Nets in Base 2
(36, 68, 26)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 68, 26)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (9, 25, 12)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 11)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 12, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 11)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (11, 43, 14)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 13)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 14, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 13)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (9, 25, 12)-net over F2, using
(36, 68, 30)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (36, 68, 30)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (36, 29)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 36 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
(36, 68, 95)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 68, 96)-net in base 2, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(268, 96, S2, 32), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 1 599539 177775 615668 865588 002816 / 5051 366145 > 268 [i]