Best Known (29, 29+12, s)-Nets in Base 25
(29, 29+12, 2631)-Net over F25 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 41, 2631)-net over F25, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 7, 27)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 26)-sequence over F25, using
- digital (22, 34, 2604)-net over F25, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2534, 2604, F25, 12, 12) (dual of [(2604, 12), 31214, 13]-NRT-code), using
- OA 6-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(2534, 15624, F25, 12) (dual of [15624, 15590, 13]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2534, 15625, F25, 12) (dual of [15625, 15591, 13]-code), using
- an extension Ce(11) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 15624 = 253−1, defining interval I = [1,11], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 12 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2534, 15625, F25, 12) (dual of [15625, 15591, 13]-code), using
- OA 6-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(2534, 15624, F25, 12) (dual of [15624, 15590, 13]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2534, 2604, F25, 12, 12) (dual of [(2604, 12), 31214, 13]-NRT-code), using
- digital (1, 7, 27)-net over F25, using
(29, 29+12, 33218)-Net over F25 — Digital
Digital (29, 41, 33218)-net over F25, using
(29, 29+12, large)-Net in Base 25 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 41, large)-net in base 25, because
- 10 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 31, large)-net in base 25, but