Best Known (76, 76+16, s)-Nets in Base 25
(76, 76+16, 1048732)-Net over F25 — Constructive and digital
Digital (76, 92, 1048732)-net over F25, using
- 251 times duplication [i] based on digital (75, 91, 1048732)-net over F25, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 15, 157)-net over F25, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2515, 157, F25, 8, 8) (dual of [(157, 8), 1241, 9]-NRT-code), using
- OA 4-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(2515, 628, F25, 8) (dual of [628, 613, 9]-code), using
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([623,5]), C2 = C([0,6]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,5]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([623,6]) [i] based on
- linear OA(2513, 624, F25, 7) (dual of [624, 611, 8]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 252−1, defining interval I = {−1,0,…,5}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 8 [i]
- linear OA(2513, 624, F25, 7) (dual of [624, 611, 8]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 252−1, defining interval I = [0,6], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 8 [i]
- linear OA(2515, 624, F25, 8) (dual of [624, 609, 9]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 252−1, defining interval I = {−1,0,…,6}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 9 [i]
- linear OA(2511, 624, F25, 6) (dual of [624, 613, 7]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 624 = 252−1, defining interval I = [0,5], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 7 [i]
- linear OA(250, 2, F25, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(250, s, F25, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(250, 2, F25, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code) (see above)
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([623,5]), C2 = C([0,6]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,5]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([623,6]) [i] based on
- OA 4-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(2515, 628, F25, 8) (dual of [628, 613, 9]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2515, 157, F25, 8, 8) (dual of [(157, 8), 1241, 9]-NRT-code), using
- digital (60, 76, 1048575)-net over F25, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2576, 1048575, F25, 16, 16) (dual of [(1048575, 16), 16777124, 17]-NRT-code), using
- OA 8-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(2576, 8388600, F25, 16) (dual of [8388600, 8388524, 17]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2576, large, F25, 16) (dual of [large, large−76, 17]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 9765624 = 255−1, defining interval I = [0,15], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 17 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2576, large, F25, 16) (dual of [large, large−76, 17]-code), using
- OA 8-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(2576, 8388600, F25, 16) (dual of [8388600, 8388524, 17]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2576, 1048575, F25, 16, 16) (dual of [(1048575, 16), 16777124, 17]-NRT-code), using
- digital (7, 15, 157)-net over F25, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(76, 76+16, large)-Net over F25 — Digital
Digital (76, 92, large)-net over F25, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (73, 92, large)-net over F25, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(2592, large, F25, 19) (dual of [large, large−92, 20]-code), using
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(2591, large, F25, 19) (dual of [large, large−91, 20]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 9765626 | 2510−1, defining interval I = [0,9], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−9,−8,…,9}|+1 = 20 (BCH-bound) [i]
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(2591, large, F25, 19) (dual of [large, large−91, 20]-code), using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(2592, large, F25, 19) (dual of [large, large−92, 20]-code), using
(76, 76+16, large)-Net in Base 25 — Upper bound on s
There is no (76, 92, large)-net in base 25, because
- 14 times m-reduction [i] would yield (76, 78, large)-net in base 25, but