Best Known (39−21, 39, s)-Nets in Base 25
(39−21, 39, 132)-Net over F25 — Constructive and digital
Digital (18, 39, 132)-net over F25, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (4, 14, 66)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 65)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 65)-sequence over F25, using
- digital (4, 25, 66)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 65)-sequence over F25 (see above)
- digital (4, 14, 66)-net over F25, using
(39−21, 39, 199)-Net over F25 — Digital
Digital (18, 39, 199)-net over F25, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(2539, 199, F25, 21) (dual of [199, 160, 22]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2539, 208, F25, 21) (dual of [208, 169, 22]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 208 | 252−1, defining interval I = [0,20], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 22 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2539, 208, F25, 21) (dual of [208, 169, 22]-code), using
(39−21, 39, 38715)-Net in Base 25 — Upper bound on s
There is no (18, 39, 38716)-net in base 25, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (18, 38, 38716)-net in base 25, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 25m ≥ 132374 906910 568428 120790 413582 198031 373822 275888 009153 > 2538 [i]