Best Known (78−26, 78, s)-Nets in Base 25
(78−26, 78, 1203)-Net over F25 — Constructive and digital
Digital (52, 78, 1203)-net over F25, using
- 251 times duplication [i] based on digital (51, 77, 1203)-net over F25, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2577, 1203, F25, 26, 26) (dual of [(1203, 26), 31201, 27]-NRT-code), using
- OA 13-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(2577, 15639, F25, 26) (dual of [15639, 15562, 27]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2577, 15641, F25, 26) (dual of [15641, 15564, 27]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(25) ⊂ Ce(20) [i] based on
- linear OA(2573, 15625, F25, 26) (dual of [15625, 15552, 27]-code), using an extension Ce(25) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 15624 = 253−1, defining interval I = [1,25], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 26 [i]
- linear OA(2561, 15625, F25, 21) (dual of [15625, 15564, 22]-code), using an extension Ce(20) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 15624 = 253−1, defining interval I = [1,20], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 21 [i]
- linear OA(254, 16, F25, 4) (dual of [16, 12, 5]-code or 16-arc in PG(3,25)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(254, 25, F25, 4) (dual of [25, 21, 5]-code or 25-arc in PG(3,25)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(21,25) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(254, 25, F25, 4) (dual of [25, 21, 5]-code or 25-arc in PG(3,25)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(25) ⊂ Ce(20) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2577, 15641, F25, 26) (dual of [15641, 15564, 27]-code), using
- OA 13-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(2577, 15639, F25, 26) (dual of [15639, 15562, 27]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2577, 1203, F25, 26, 26) (dual of [(1203, 26), 31201, 27]-NRT-code), using
(78−26, 78, 12468)-Net over F25 — Digital
Digital (52, 78, 12468)-net over F25, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(2578, 12468, F25, 26) (dual of [12468, 12390, 27]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2578, 15645, F25, 26) (dual of [15645, 15567, 27]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(25) ⊂ Ce(19) [i] based on
- linear OA(2573, 15625, F25, 26) (dual of [15625, 15552, 27]-code), using an extension Ce(25) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 15624 = 253−1, defining interval I = [1,25], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 26 [i]
- linear OA(2558, 15625, F25, 20) (dual of [15625, 15567, 21]-code), using an extension Ce(19) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 15624 = 253−1, defining interval I = [1,19], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 20 [i]
- linear OA(255, 20, F25, 5) (dual of [20, 15, 6]-code or 20-arc in PG(4,25)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(255, 25, F25, 5) (dual of [25, 20, 6]-code or 25-arc in PG(4,25)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(20,25) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(255, 25, F25, 5) (dual of [25, 20, 6]-code or 25-arc in PG(4,25)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(25) ⊂ Ce(19) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2578, 15645, F25, 26) (dual of [15645, 15567, 27]-code), using
(78−26, 78, large)-Net in Base 25 — Upper bound on s
There is no (52, 78, large)-net in base 25, because
- 24 times m-reduction [i] would yield (52, 54, large)-net in base 25, but