Best Known (95−31, 95, s)-Nets in Base 25
(95−31, 95, 1043)-Net over F25 — Constructive and digital
Digital (64, 95, 1043)-net over F25, using
- 251 times duplication [i] based on digital (63, 94, 1043)-net over F25, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2594, 1043, F25, 31, 31) (dual of [(1043, 31), 32239, 32]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 15-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(2594, 15646, F25, 31) (dual of [15646, 15552, 32]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2594, 15649, F25, 31) (dual of [15649, 15555, 32]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(30) ⊂ Ce(23) [i] based on
- linear OA(2588, 15625, F25, 31) (dual of [15625, 15537, 32]-code), using an extension Ce(30) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 15624 = 253−1, defining interval I = [1,30], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 31 [i]
- linear OA(2570, 15625, F25, 24) (dual of [15625, 15555, 25]-code), using an extension Ce(23) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 15624 = 253−1, defining interval I = [1,23], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 24 [i]
- linear OA(256, 24, F25, 6) (dual of [24, 18, 7]-code or 24-arc in PG(5,25)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(256, 25, F25, 6) (dual of [25, 19, 7]-code or 25-arc in PG(5,25)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(19,25) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(256, 25, F25, 6) (dual of [25, 19, 7]-code or 25-arc in PG(5,25)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(30) ⊂ Ce(23) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2594, 15649, F25, 31) (dual of [15649, 15555, 32]-code), using
- OOA 15-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(2594, 15646, F25, 31) (dual of [15646, 15552, 32]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2594, 1043, F25, 31, 31) (dual of [(1043, 31), 32239, 32]-NRT-code), using
(95−31, 95, 15651)-Net over F25 — Digital
Digital (64, 95, 15651)-net over F25, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(2595, 15651, F25, 31) (dual of [15651, 15556, 32]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(30) ⊂ Ce(22) [i] based on
- linear OA(2588, 15625, F25, 31) (dual of [15625, 15537, 32]-code), using an extension Ce(30) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 15624 = 253−1, defining interval I = [1,30], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 31 [i]
- linear OA(2567, 15625, F25, 23) (dual of [15625, 15558, 24]-code), using an extension Ce(22) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 15624 = 253−1, defining interval I = [1,22], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 23 [i]
- linear OA(257, 26, F25, 7) (dual of [26, 19, 8]-code or 26-arc in PG(6,25)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(19,25) [i]
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 26 | 252−1, defining interval I = [0,3], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−3,−2,…,3}|+1 = 8 (BCH-bound) [i]
- algebraic-geometric code AG(F,9P) with degPÂ =Â 2 [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 26, using the rational function field F25(x) [i]
- algebraic-geometric code AG(F,6P) with degPÂ =Â 3 [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 26 (see above)
- construction X applied to Ce(30) ⊂ Ce(22) [i] based on
(95−31, 95, large)-Net in Base 25 — Upper bound on s
There is no (64, 95, large)-net in base 25, because
- 29 times m-reduction [i] would yield (64, 66, large)-net in base 25, but